Tinubu’s Legal Team breaks silence on watermark on Presidential Tribunal’s judgement

Publisher
By Publisher
2 Min Read
TPLT Coordinator, Babatunde Ogala (SAN)

The Tinubu Presidential Legal Team (TPLT) this Saturday evening, September 9, 2023, broke its silence on its watermark on the widely circulated copies of the judgement of the Presidential Election Petition Tribunal (PEPT).

TPLT Coordinator, Babatunde Ogala (SAN)

Critics have been insinuating that the watermark was as a result of pre-determined manipulations that made the PEPT to render judgement in favour of Tinubu.

However, a statement on Saturday by TPLT Coordinator Babatunde Ogala (SAN) said there was nothing untoward with the watermark.

It explained: “Following some mischievous insinuations being made in certain quarters regarding the innocuous water-mark of copies of the consolidated judgment of the Court of Appeal with the inscription – “Tinubu Presidential Legal Team ‘TPLT’”, it is has become necessary to offer this clarification.

“After the delivery of judgment in the 3 (Three) election petitions by the Court of Appeal on September 6, 2023, the Court directed its registry to make physical copies of same available on September 7, 2023.

“Accordingly, the Tinubu Presidential Legal Team applied for a certified true copy of the said judgment and paid the prescribed fee.

Lawyers for PDP were present at the registry at the same time to collect the same judgment.

“In fact, the representative of the PDP collected the first copy that was made available by the registry.

“On collecting our own copy, we immediately scanned and water-marked with the inscription – “Tinubu Presidential Legal Team ‘TPLT” before circulating the scanned soft copies to the lawyers in our team.

“The certified true copies issued to us and other parties in the petitions by the registry do not contain the said inscription and any insinuation to the contrary is untrue.

“Counsel to the petitioners will also appreciate the fact that the insinuations being circulated in some quarters are untrue, unkind, unfair, and unfortunate, as they have the same certified copies of the judgment as we have.” (Culled from The Nation)

Share This Article
Follow:
At Crossfire Reports, we will tell your story and we take both sides of the story and subject matter. Also place your adverts on www.crossfirereports.com and send your stories opinions to mike@crossfirereports.com